Sustainable Packaging Without Sacrificing Production Throughput

Packaging across Australia and New Zealand is getting thinner. Not because manufacturers have cut corners, but because reducing substrate weight is one of the most direct and measurable ways to lower material consumption, reduce shipping emissions, and move closer to sustainability targets. A pouch that was once 80 microns is now 60. A corrugated shipper that carried a generous flute profile has been redesigned with a lighter board grade. Recycled-content materials have replaced virgin substrates on lines that were never set up to handle them.

The intent is right. But the production consequences can be significant, and they tend to show up first in the coding and labelling booth.

At ALDUS™ Tronics, we work with manufacturers across Australia and New Zealand every week who are navigating exactly this challenge. The packaging has changed. The line has not been updated to match. And somewhere between the sustainability brief and the production floor, reject rates have started climbing and throughput has started slipping.

This article explains why that happens, what can be done about it, and how the right technical partner makes the difference between a smooth transition and an expensive one.

The Regulatory Pressure Driving Change

The shift to sustainable substrates is not discretionary for most manufacturers. According to the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation (APCO), 86% of packaging in Australia is currently reusable, recyclable, or compostable against a target of 100%, while only 20% of plastic packaging is being recycled or composted against a target of 70%. Those gaps represent significant work still to be done, and they are translating directly into material reformulations, substrate changes, and packaging redesigns across the supply chain.

For manufacturers in food, beverage, pet food, personal care, and household goods, the pressure is coming from multiple directions at once: regulatory frameworks, retail sustainability requirements, and consumer expectation. The result is that packaging decisions which once happened over years are now being compressed into months.

The production line rarely gets the same urgency.

Why Thinner and Recycled Substrates Create Coding Challenges

Conventional coding and labelling systems were configured and optimised around the materials that were standard at the time of installation. When those materials change, the variables that govern print quality, adhesion, and drying also change, often in ways that are not immediately obvious until production is underway.

The four challenges that appear most consistently are these.

  1. Ink Adhesion on New Surfaces
    Recycled-content materials and lightweight substrates often have different surface energy characteristics to their conventional counterparts. Ink that bonded reliably to a glossy virgin board may sit on the surface of an uncoated recycled alternative, smear under handling, or fail inspection entirely. On porous materials, the opposite problem can occur: ink is absorbed too quickly and codes appear faint or inconsistent.
  2. Structural Sensitivity to Heat and Contact
    Thinner substrates are more sensitive to the thermal and mechanical forces involved in coding. A thermal transfer printhead that applied just enough pressure and temperature to a 100-micron film may distort or perforate a 60-micron equivalent. Techniques that were invisible on heavier board can leave physical impressions on lighter grades.
  3. Extended Drying Times
    Some sustainable materials require longer ink cure times, particularly where surface coatings have changed. On a high-speed line, even a marginal increase in drying time affects throughput. Products may reach a downstream process before codes have fully cured, leading to smearing, poor adhesion, or failed quality checks.
  4. Higher Reject Rates and Rework
    The cumulative effect of adhesion issues, material sensitivity, and drying variation is an increase in rejects. Products that pass at lower speeds may fail under full production conditions. Rework drives up waste, which directly erodes the sustainability benefit the packaging change was meant to deliver.

A Real-World Example: Food Pouch Packaging, Thinner Film, and UV Laser Coding

One of the clearest examples of this challenge came from an Australian food manufacturer who approached ALDUS™ Tronics with a specific brief. They wanted to reduce the gauge of their flexible film packaging as part of a broader sustainability program. The thinner film used less material, generated less waste, and aligned with their group-level packaging reduction targets. On paper, it was a straightforward win.

On the production line, it was a different story.

Their existing coding system relied on a technology that applied sufficient energy to the film surface to produce a legible, durable code. At the original film thickness, this worked reliably. At the reduced gauge, the same energy that previously produced a clean code was now at risk of compromising the structural integrity of the film itself. A weakened seal point is not an acceptable outcome in food packaging, where integrity is directly tied to product safety and shelf life.

The ALDUS™ Tronics technical team assessed the application in detail and recommended a UV laser coding solution. UV laser technology operates at a wavelength and energy level that produces a high-contrast, permanent code on the film surface without the thermal penetration that was creating risk on the thinner substrate. The code quality met all regulatory and retailer requirements. The film integrity was preserved. And the line ran at full speed without any modification to the packaging design or the downstream process.

The manufacturer achieved their sustainability goal without compromise. The substrate got thinner. The coding got better.

Matching the Right Solution to Your Materials

This is the central point that gets missed in many packaging transition projects. There is rarely a single correct answer for coding on sustainable materials. The right solution depends on the substrate, the line speed, the code requirement, the environment, and the downstream handling of the product. That is why a broad technology capability matters as much as product knowledge.

Here is how the most common challenges map to proven approaches:

Challenge

Production Impact

Recommended Approach

Ink adhesion on porous or uncoated recycled surfaces

Faint, smudged, or non-compliant codes

Ink type review, print head settings adjustment, or switch to laser coding

Thermal or mechanical sensitivity on thinner substrates

Film distortion, perforation, or weakened seals

UV laser coding, which applies no contact and minimal thermal load

Extended ink drying or cure time

Reduced throughput and downstream smearing

UV-curable ink systems or line setup optimisation

Inconsistent material surface properties across batches

Variable print quality and elevated rework

Substrate profiling and parameter testing before full rollout

Label adhesive failure on recycled or uncoated board

Label lift, bubbling, or loss

Label material and adhesive matching to substrate type

In most cases, equipment replacement is not required. The answer often lies in configuration, ink selection, or a targeted technology upgrade that preserves your existing line investment.

Why ALDUS™ Tronics Is Different

There are a number of coding and labelling suppliers operating in Australia and New Zealand. What separates ALDUS™ Tronics is not just the breadth of technology we offer, but what stands behind it.

ALDUS™ Tronics has been a Videojet authorised distributor in Australia for over 20 years, and is the exclusive distributor for Videojet in New Zealand. Our technical team is trained directly by Videojet, which means the knowledge we bring to your line reflects the same engineering depth that sits behind the equipment itself. When we assess a substrate compatibility challenge, we are not reading from a generic troubleshooting guide. We are drawing on more than two decades of application experience across food, beverage, pharmaceutical, pet food, personal care, and industrial manufacturing environments in this region.

That local presence matters more than it might initially appear. When something changes on your line, whether that is a new substrate arriving from a supplier, a speed increase, or an unexpected spike in rejects, you need a team that can be with you quickly. Not a global support queue. Not a remote diagnosis from a different time zone. ALDUS™ Tronics provides local technical support, local parts inventory, and local people who understand the specific regulatory and operational context of manufacturing in Australia and New Zealand.

Our technology range spans continuous inkjet, thermal inkjet, UV and CO2 laser coding, thermal transfer overprinting, and print and apply labelling. That breadth means we can recommend the right solution for your specific combination of material, environment, and performance requirement rather than fitting your needs around a limited catalogue.

We are not a transactional supplier. We are a long-term production partner. The food manufacturer described above did not just get a piece of equipment from us. They got an assessment, a recommendation, an installation, and ongoing support from a team that now understands their line and their materials. That relationship does not end at commissioning.

FAQ

  1. Will I need to replace my existing coding equipment when I switch to sustainable packaging materials?
    Not necessarily, and in many cases the answer is no. Ink formulation changes, print parameter adjustments, and substrate-specific configuration can resolve the majority of adhesion and quality issues without requiring a capital investment. The starting point is always an honest assessment of your current setup against the new material. ALDUS™ Tronics carries out that assessment as part of how we engage with new packaging transition projects, so you have a clear picture before any decision is made.
  2. How do thinner substrates specifically affect coding performance?
    Thinner substrates reduce the tolerance margin for the energy, pressure, and temperature that coding systems apply during marking. What worked safely on a heavier gauge may create distortion, weakening, or perforation on a lighter one. The risk is not always visible in slow-speed trials; it often only becomes apparent at full production speed and under downstream handling conditions. UV laser coding is particularly well suited to thin-gauge flexible films because it produces a high-contrast, permanent code with no contact and minimal thermal load, which is exactly how it resolved the challenge for the food manufacturer described in this article.
  3. How do I know if my coding system will perform on a new sustainable substrate before I commit to the change?
    Testing against the actual material is the most reliable method, and it is something ALDUS™ Tronics can conduct using your existing equipment and proposed substrate before your production rollout begins. This gives you verified performance data rather than assumptions, which is particularly important when the packaging change is being driven by a sustainability commitment that carries its own reporting obligations.
  4. What if our packaging materials vary across our product range or change seasonally with supplier availability?
    This is increasingly common as recycled-content availability fluctuates and sustainable material specifications evolve. Coding systems with broad ink compatibility and adjustable parameters handle this variability better than systems configured for a single substrate. Part of the value ALDUS™ Tronics brings is helping you specify a setup that has the flexibility to accommodate material variation without requiring manual recalibration every time a substrate changes.
  5. Can sustainable packaging still meet all regulatory coding requirements in Australia and New Zealand?
    Yes. The requirements for code legibility, permanence, and content under Australian and New Zealand food, pharmaceutical, and product safety regulations do not change because the substrate does. The obligation is the same; the method of meeting it needs to be matched to the material. That is precisely where technical support from a partner with deep local knowledge and direct manufacturer training makes the difference.

Working Through the Transition Together

Manufacturers that bring their coding and labelling partner into the conversation at the packaging design stage consistently experience fewer surprises when they reach production. The ones who treat packaging material changes as a procurement decision and inform their coding supplier after the fact are the ones who tend to absorb the cost of an unplanned transition.

Having a technical partner who understands your line, your materials, and your sustainability targets, and who has the local presence and manufacturer-level training to support you as both evolve, is not a nice-to-have. It is a practical operational advantage.

Get in touch with ALDUS™ Tronics to discuss your sustainable packaging requirements and find out how our team can support your transition without compromising your throughput.

Ready to see if ALDUS™ Tronics has the right solution for you?